Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 1:19:05 GMT -5
Have valued very positively the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) known today that rules that the exclusion of unemployment benefits for domestic workers is contrary to the European directive on Equality in matters of Social Security . 95% of the people affiliated with the Special System for Domestic Employees are women, so their exclusion from unemployment contributions and receipt of the benefit constitutes indirect discrimination based on sex, considers the CJEU. Domestic workers earn less than half the average salary in Spain has described this ruling as “historic” and demands that the equalization of domestic workers in access to unemployment protection be addressed “urgently.” The ruling of the European justice comes after a claim from a worker who in 2019 was denied the ability to contribute by the General Treasury of Social Security for the unemployment contingency.
The precariousness of domestic work in 5 devastating facts Given the denial, a contentious administrative appeal was filed for indirect discrimination on the basis of sex in matters of Social Security for women domestic workers, on which the CJEU has now ruled, pointing out the incompatibility of the national regulatory provision with the Right of the Union and with Guatemala Mobile Number List Directive because it constitutes indirect discrimination on the basis of sex in access to social security benefits. Domestic workers and bureaucracy This ruling is a very important step towards the recognition of the rights of women domestic workers and their equality with respect to the rest of the workers and at we want to express our satisfaction and continue to demand that this issue be addressed urgently and that it be put to an end. with this discrimination. This Sentence must be a definitive milestone. It is time to address this issue immediately and correct this obvious discrimination,” says .
For its part, UGT demands the “immediate” opening of the Social Dialogue table to address the employment and social security relationship of these workers, “in order to advance in the equalization of rights and end the discrimination that their exclusion entails.” of unemployment benefits, of the law on the prevention of occupational risks and of the application of particularities to this sector that distance them from the rights enjoyed by the rest of the workers.” Both unions also reiterate the need to ratify Convention 189 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) on domestic workers, “which successive governments have refused, precisely because it would imply the inclusion of this group in unemployment protection, reiterating breach of the previous commitment.” Not knowing that your domestic worker is pregnant does not exempt you from a null dismissal “The care system in Spain is built on gender injustices and social.
The precariousness of domestic work in 5 devastating facts Given the denial, a contentious administrative appeal was filed for indirect discrimination on the basis of sex in matters of Social Security for women domestic workers, on which the CJEU has now ruled, pointing out the incompatibility of the national regulatory provision with the Right of the Union and with Guatemala Mobile Number List Directive because it constitutes indirect discrimination on the basis of sex in access to social security benefits. Domestic workers and bureaucracy This ruling is a very important step towards the recognition of the rights of women domestic workers and their equality with respect to the rest of the workers and at we want to express our satisfaction and continue to demand that this issue be addressed urgently and that it be put to an end. with this discrimination. This Sentence must be a definitive milestone. It is time to address this issue immediately and correct this obvious discrimination,” says .
For its part, UGT demands the “immediate” opening of the Social Dialogue table to address the employment and social security relationship of these workers, “in order to advance in the equalization of rights and end the discrimination that their exclusion entails.” of unemployment benefits, of the law on the prevention of occupational risks and of the application of particularities to this sector that distance them from the rights enjoyed by the rest of the workers.” Both unions also reiterate the need to ratify Convention 189 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) on domestic workers, “which successive governments have refused, precisely because it would imply the inclusion of this group in unemployment protection, reiterating breach of the previous commitment.” Not knowing that your domestic worker is pregnant does not exempt you from a null dismissal “The care system in Spain is built on gender injustices and social.